Value-based care (VBC) now accounts for more than half of all US healthcare payments. But providers are often torn on the model: 61% told one survey they believed value-based models would negatively impact their practice – and 63% feared a shift away from FFS would harm their earnings.
This article reveals how recent research disputes these claims – and explains how VBC can offer a win-win for providers, payers, and patients.
Value-based reimbursement (VBR) is a model that pays healthcare providers based on patient outcomes rather than just services rendered. In contrast to fee-for-service (FFS) models, it foregrounds quality over quantity and seeks to align professional values with financial incentives.
Value-based care (VBC) is built around two basic reimbursement methods:
This supports a range of collaborative models where provides coordinate care and focus on delivering value for patients – such as:
Both of which have grown in popularity in recent years.
Value-based reimbursement supports better patient care; one recent study concluded that it “increases efficiency and generates social impact by reducing healthcare inequity and improving population health”. From increasing care coordination to incentivizing quality care, it can dramatically improve provider performance.
The question is whether providers and payers see similar benefits – and how they can fully realize them.
Providers and payers want to improve care quality and deliver the best possible patient outcomes – which value-based models help achieve. But there are multiple further benefits to be considered, too.
Value-based reimbursement helps providers realize:
Value-based reimbursement enables payers to:
Yet despite these benefits, many providers and payers face challenges when introducing value-based reimbursement models.
From tracking performance metrics to eliminating gaps in medical histories to enabling pre-vist planning, value-based reimbursement models require extensive documentation. But research shows that most providers and payers struggle to consistently achieve accurate documentation – and often encounter issues with fragmented or incomplete patient data.
This makes it difficult to optimize quality scores, coordinate care across multiple providers, and submit accurate medical coding to ensure each party is properly compensated. Providers may fear they the model will negatively impact their earnings or put extra pressure on their practice.
That is why providers and payers are embracing HCC Assistant: an innovative tool that enables seamless medical documentation and unlocks better provider-payer collaboration. With natural-language process (NLP), the tool ingests structure and unstructured patient data to create more accurate and complete risk adjustment information – and increase the average provider’s RAF scores by 35%.
Want to see it in action?